PFAS in Cosmetics: Understanding the Regulatory and Consumer Landscape in the United States
In recent years, the presence of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in cosmetics has sparked significant concern among consumers, regulators, and industry professionals in the United States. Commonly referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and the human body, PFAS are under increasing scrutiny for their potential health risks and environmental impact.
What Are PFAS and Why Are They Used in Cosmetics?
PFAS are a group of synthetic chemicals widely used for their unique properties, including water resistance, oil repellence, and durability. In the cosmetics industry, PFAS are typically added to products such as foundation, mascara, lipstick, and eyeliners to enhance their texture, durability, and water resistance.
Common PFAS found in cosmetics include:
- Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
- Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
- Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
While these compounds provide desirable qualities in cosmetic formulations, their environmental persistence and potential links to adverse health outcomes have made their use increasingly controversial.
Potential Health Concerns Associated with PFAS
Research has linked PFAS exposure to various health risks, including:
- Hormonal Disruption: PFAS may interfere with the endocrine system.
- Immune System Suppression: Studies suggest that PFAS can reduce the effectiveness of vaccines.
- Increased Cancer Risk: Certain PFAS compounds have been associated with kidney and testicular cancer.
- Developmental Effects: PFAS exposure during pregnancy may impact fetal development.
The concern is compounded by the fact that PFAS are bioaccumulative, meaning they build up in the body over time and are not easily eliminated.
PFAS Regulation in U.S. Cosmetics
Currently, the United States does not have comprehensive federal regulations specifically banning or restricting PFAS in cosmetics. However, there have been notable developments at both the federal and state levels:
Federal Action
- MoCRA (Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022): Signed into law in December 2022, this act aims to modernize U.S. cosmetics regulations. While it does not directly address PFAS, it gives the FDA broader authority to evaluate ingredient safety and enforce manufacturing standards.
- FDA Investigations: The FDA has conducted studies to assess the prevalence of PFAS in cosmetics and its potential risks and will publish results by December 29th, 2025. However, no bans or mandatory disclosures have been implemented at the federal level yet.
State-Level Action
- California: Under the Toxic-Free Cosmetics Act, California banned 13 PFAS compounds in cosmetics, effective January 1, 2025.
- Maryland: Passed similar legislation banning certain PFAS in cosmetics, aligning with California’s timeline.
- Other States: Several other states, including Washington and Maine, have introduced legislation targeting PFAS in cosmetics and consumer products.
Consumer Awareness and Industry Response
Growing awareness of PFAS-related risks has led to a significant shift in consumer preferences. Many buyers are now seeking “PFAS-free” cosmetics, and brands are responding by reformulating products to eliminate these chemicals.
Trends in the Cosmetics Industry
- PFAS-Free Formulations: Leading brands are actively removing PFAS from their products to meet consumer demand and comply with evolving regulations.
- Eco-Friendly Packaging and Claims: Companies are focusing on marketing transparency, often including “PFAS-free” labels on products.
- Increased Testing and Certifications: Third-party certifications, such as “Clean at Sephora” or EWG Verified™, are becoming benchmarks for PFAS-free and safer products.
Challenges in Eliminating PFAS
- Technical Difficulties: PFAS are valued for their unique properties, such as durability and water resistance. Finding alternatives that deliver similar performance is a significant challenge for formulators.
- Supply Chain Complexity: Manufacturers may unintentionally include PFAS through contaminated raw materials or as processing aids.
- Regulatory Inconsistency: The lack of unified federal regulations creates challenges for companies operating in multiple states.
Future Outlook
With increasing public and regulatory attention, the use of PFAS in cosmetics is expected to face stricter oversight. Key trends to watch include:
- Federal Regulation: Enhanced FDA oversight under MoCRA may pave the way for stricter federal standards on PFAS.
- Innovation in Alternatives: The industry is likely to invest heavily in research and development of PFAS-free alternatives that deliver comparable performance.
- Global Standards: The U.S. may align more closely with international regulations, such as those in the EU, where certain PFAS compounds are already restricted in cosmetics.
Conclusion
The debate over PFAS in cosmetics reflects broader concerns about sustainability, transparency, and safety in the beauty industry. While PFAS offer unique benefits in formulations, their environmental persistence and potential health risks have made them a target for reform. As the regulatory landscape evolves, companies must prioritize safety, invest in innovation, and embrace transparency to meet consumer expectations and comply with future standards.
By proactively addressing the PFAS issue, the cosmetics industry has the opportunity to lead the way in creating safer, more sustainable products for consumers and the environment.
Contact Cosmereg if you have any doubts regarding the PFAS in Cosmetics
